If problems or conflicts arise during the workshop, you can stop them and refer them to the agreement established by the group at the beginning. (z.B. we all agreed to listen to others and allow them to share their ideas…). 4. Make a list of agreements, discuss, bee-down, an agreement on results. They can be specific, behavioral and qualitative. One element of agreement could be this: there are many ways to conclude group agreements. To decide to use them, you can consider some of the following: whether the group will work together in the longer term, what is the controversy over the topic of the meeting or workshop, how long you have and how much confidence the group has in you as a mediator. 1) Team agreements can be concluded by the team alone or with the help of a moderator, but the most important factor in getting the buy-in is that the team has created its own agreement, for itself. The best team agreements are those that: If you work again with the group, the agreement should be maintained for future meetings or workshops (especially important for project teams). Whenever you do a workshop or meeting with the group, you should check the group agreement and make sure everyone is always satisfied.
If something has to change, change it. Remember that the team and the best of them in the time you have. As I mentioned above, I am not a fan of the term “group rules.” When I present agreements to a group for the first time, I often ask, “What is the difference between rules and agreements?” This is what young people say in one version or another: “If you break a rule, you will be punished.” “That`s true. And if you go beyond the limits of an agreement, it`s more like a conversation. I thought we agreed. Do you still agree? I`d answer. Brainstorming from across the class: Look for an agreement on ideas, add them to a poster that appears during each lesson. Other methods of developing group agreements may be appropriate for shorter workshops or meetings. You should finish it in less than 15 minutes, and make the deal for anyone, ideally, write on a whiteboard or use paperboard and put it on the wall. Making these decisions as a group is much more effective than having a mediator who imposes “rules” for all.
In addition, citizens are much more likely to respect and implement an agreement to which they have contributed. It`s going to make your job as an intermediary a lot easier. In case of problem or conflict, you can use this agreement (for example.B. We all agreed at the beginning that it was better for one person to speak at the same time…). Group agreements lead to a normative and therapeutic culture. This culture leads to trust, cohesion and vulnerability. Of course, other factors such as group size, mixed sex, etc. play a role in normative culture, but a fundamental type of “being” helps further in these processes.